欢迎访问知识产权学术与实务研究网! [请登录], 新用户?[免费注册] 设为首页|添加收藏|联系我们|网站地图|English
当前位置:知识产权学术与实务研究网 > english > IP Conventions > Trademark >  文章

Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registrat

来源:知识产权学术与实务研究网  作者:  时间:2008-06-11  阅读数:

(2) The application for international registration (hereinafter referred to as “the international application”) shall be filed with the International Bureau through the intermediary of the Office with which the basic application was filed or by which the basic registration was made (hereinafter referred to as “the Office of origin”), as the case may be.

 (3) Any reference in this Protocol to an “Office” or an “Office of a Contracting Party” shall be construed as a reference to the office that is in charge, on behalf of a Contracting Party, of the registration of marks, and any reference in this Protocol to “marks” shall be construed as a reference to trademarks and service marks.

 (4) For the purposes of this Protocol, “territory of a Contracting Party” means, where the Contracting Party is a State, the territory of that State and, where the Contracting Party is an intergovernmental organization, the territory in which the constituting treaty of that intergovernmental organization applies.

Article 3

International Application

 

(1) Every international application under this Protocol shall be presented on the form prescribed by the Regulations. The Office of origin shall certify that the particulars appearing in the international application correspond to the particulars appearing, at the time of the certification, in the basic application or basic registration, as the case may be. Furthermore, the said Office shall indicate,

(i) the protection resulting from the international registration extends to the said Contracting Party under Article 3ter(1) or (2),

(ii) all the goods and services listed in the national or regional registration are also listed in the international registration in respect of the said Contracting Party,

(iii) such extension takes effect after the date of the national or regional registration.

(2) The Office referred to in paragraph (1) shall, upon request, be required to take note in its register of the international registration.

Article 5

Refusal and Invalidation of Effects of International Registration
in Respect of Certain Contracting Parties

 

(1) Where the applicable legislation so authorizes, any Office of a Contracting Party which has been notified by the International Bureau of an extension to that Contracting Party, under Article 3ter(1) or (2), of the protection resulting from the international registration shall have the right to declare in a notification of refusal that protection cannot be granted in the said Contracting Party to the mark which is the subject of such extension. Any such refusal can be based only on the grounds which would apply, under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, in the case of a mark deposited direct with the Office which notifies the refusal. However, protection may not be refused, even partially, by reason only that the applicable legislation would permit registration only in a limited number of classes or for a limited number of goods or services.

(2)

(a) Any Office wishing to exercise such right shall notify its refusal to the International Bureau, together with a statement of all grounds, within the period prescribed by the law applicable to that Office and at the latest, subject to subparagraphs (b) and (c), before the expiry of one year from the date on which the notification of the extension referred to in paragraph (1) has been sent to that Office by the International Bureau.

(b) Notwithstanding subparagraph (a), any Contracting Party may declare that, for international registrations made under this Protocol, the time limit of one year referred to in subparagraph (a) is replaced by 18 months.

(c) Such declaration may also specify that, when a refusal of protection may result from an opposition to the granting of protection, such refusal may be notified by the Office of the said Contracting Party to the International Bureau after the expiry of the 18–month time limit. Such an Office may, with respect to any given international registration, notify a refusal of protection after the expiry of the 18–month time limit, but only if

(i) it has, before the expiry of the 18–month time limit, informed the International Bureau of the possibility that oppositions may be filed after the expiry of the 18–month time limit, and

(ii) the notification of the refusal based on an opposition is made within a time limit of not more than seven months from the date on which the opposition period begins; if the opposition period expires before this time limit of seven months, the notification must be made within a time limit of one month from the expiry of the opposition period.

(d) Any declaration under subparagraphs (b) or (c) may be made in the instruments referred to in Article 14(2), and the effective date of the declaration shall be the same as the date of entry into force of this Protocol with respect to the State or intergovernmental organization having made the declaration. Any such declaration may also be made later, in which case the declaration shall have effect three months after its receipt by the Director General of the Organization (hereinafter referred to as “the Director General”), or at any later date indicated in the declaration, in respect of any international registration whose date is the same as or is later than the effective date of the declaration.

共8页: 上一页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 下一页
相关文章
Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks
Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative
Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services
Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services
Trademark Law Treaty
网站创始人
个人简介:(学术)
中国政法大学教授、博士生导师
知识产权法研究所所长、无形资产管理研究中心主任
北京大学法学博士
中国人民大学法学博士后
邮箱:fengxiaoqingipr@sina.com
北京市海淀区西土城路25号中国政法大学知识产权法研究所
个人简介:(实务)
最高法院案例指导工作专家委员会委员
最高法院知识产权司法保护研究中心首届研究员
中欧仲裁中心仲裁员
深圳、南京仲裁委员会仲裁员
北京天驰君泰律师事务所律师
中国律协知识产权专业委员会委员
中国审判研究会知识产权审判理论专业委员会委员
热点文章排行
联系我们更多>>
通讯处:(Zip:100088)
点击进入免费咨询>>

All rights reserved  备ICP证号:京ICP备12039890号 公安备案号:京公网安备:11011402010413号

技术支持:律师营销网  您是网站第位访客