知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿研究——人文精神、制度理性与规范设计

Sensonics, Inc. v. Aerosonic Corp., 81 F. 3d 1566, 1574(Fed. Cir. 1996).

[36] Lam, Inc., 718F.2d at 747.

[37] State Industries, Inc. v. Mor-Flo Industries. Inc., 883F. 2d 1573, 1757(Fed. Cir. 1997).

[38] F.W.Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc., 344 U.S. 228, 232-33 (1952).

[39] 同上注。

[40] 参见第106届美国国会（1999-2000）众议院报告106-206（H.R. REP. NO. 106-216 at 6），http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&dbname=cp106&sid=cp106bAFsY&refer&r_n=hr216.106&item&sel=TOC_2422&，2015年9月14日访问。

[41] See Uniform Trade Secrets Act § 3 (b), 14 U.L.A. 634 (2005).

[42] PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. §5302 (2004), See Gretchen L. Jankowski, Primer on Pennsylvania Trade Secret Law Following Enactment of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, October, p.4(2004).

[43] Copyright Act of Canada, http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-42.pdf, 转引自朱丹：《知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度研究》，华东政法大学2013年博士论文。

[44] 同上注。

[45] Aron Edgar and Grant W. C. Tisdall: Punitive Damages Award in Canada due to Implied Knowledge of Infringed Patent, http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.

[46] Eurocopter v. Bell Helicopter, 2012 FC 113.

[47] Nathaniel C. Love, Comment: Nominal Reasonable Royalties for Patent Infringement, 75U. Chi. L. Rev. 1749(2008).

[48] Louis Vuiton et al. v. Singga Enterprises(Canada) Inc. et al. 2011 FC 776.

[49] 范长军：《德国专利法研究》，科学出版社2010年12月第1版，第227页。

[50] 陈富聪主编：《月旦小六法》，元照出版社2011年版，第伍-283页。

[51] PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. §5302 (2004), See Gretchen L. Jankowski, Primer on Pennsylvania Trade Secret Law Following Enactment of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Pennsylvania Bar  Association Quarterly, October, p.4(2004).

[52] Ala.Code § 6–11–20(a) (1993).

[53] 前引[25]，温世扬、邱永清文。

[54] 钱玉文，骆福林：“论我国知识产权法中的惩罚性赔偿”，《法学杂志》，2009年第4期。

[55] Nezar, Reconciling Punitive Damages with Tort Law’s Normative Framework, Yale Law Journal,Vol.121, No.3. p.687-689(2011).

[56] 参见程啸：《侵权行为法总论》，中国人民大学出版社，2008年版，第388-389页。

[57] 302 F. Supp. 2d 455 (D. Md. 2004).

[58] 491 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2007).

[59] 357 F. App'x 10 (9th Cir. 2009).

[60] Sony BMG Music Entm't v. Tenenbaum, 2010 WL 2705499 (D. Mass. 2010), 被告Tenenbaum是一个本科学生，因在网络上复制和分享了有版权的歌曲而被判处675000美元法定赔偿。

[61] Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset, 680 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (D. Minn. 2010).被告Thomas-Rasset是意一位印第安人，单亲母亲，因在网络上复制和分享了有版权的歌曲而被判处1920000美元法定赔偿。

[62] BMW of N. Am., Inc. v. Gore, 646 So. 2d 619, 621 (Ala. 1994), rev’d 517 U.S. 559 (1996).

[63] Laura J. Hines, Engle v. R.J. ReynoldsTobacco Co.: Lessons in State Class Actions, Punitive Damages, and Jury Decision-Making Obstacles to Determining Punitive Damages in Class Actions, 36 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 925.

[64] Sheila N. Birnbaum, Punitive Damages and Due Process: How Much is Too Much, Benjamin N.Cardozo Lecture, THE RECORD, 61 No. 2,p.165,180(2006).